As someone who is often fascinated by the unforeseen and lesser known and often less talked about outcomes of war…
…I found this to be rather interesting and thought I would share it here and give [b]SWeople[/b] here a chance to share their thoughts on this topic:
[b] Returning soldier effect[/b]
[quote][b]
The returning soldier effect[/b] is a phenomenon which suggests that more boys are born immediately after wars. This effect is one of the many factors influencing human sex ratio. It was especially noticeable worldwide during and right after both of the World Wars.
The phenomenon was first noticed in 1883 by Carl Düsing of the University of Jena, who suggested that it was a natural regulation of the status quo. Writing in 1899, an Australian physician, Arthur Davenport, used Düsing's findings to hypothesize that the cause was the difference between the comparative ill-health of the returning troops compared to the good health of their partners.
Research published in 1954 by Brian MacMahon and Thomas F. Pugh showed that the sex ratio of white live births in the United States had shown a marked increase in favor of boys between 1945 and 1947, after World War II, with a peak in 1946.
In 2007, Kanazawa Satoshi published a paper theorizing that the effect was due to "the fact that taller soldiers are more likely to survive battle and that taller parents are more likely to have sons". This was based on his research of British Army records from the First World War, which showed that "surviving soldiers were on average more than one inch (3.33 cm) taller than fallen soldiers".[1] Other genetic explanations have been proposed.
Valerie Grant attributed it to changing hormone levels of women during war, as they tended to "adopt more dominant roles".
William H. James writing in 2008 gave an increase in coital rates by returning soldiers as a possible cause. He also noted that a fall in the ratio of male births had been recorded in Iran following the Iran–Iraq War, "explained by psychological stress causing pregnant women disproportionately to abort male fetuses".
The normal ratio is estimated to be some 1.03 to 1.06 males per female, which appears to compensate for the fact that child mortality rate among boys is slightly bigger than among girls, and that adult men are a bit more likely to die from an accident than women.
[/b][/quote]
-Wikipedia
In an increasingly complex and evolving data driven world I find myself further intrigued and interested sometimes concerned and sometimes horrified or simply confused and/or just frustrated by the lack of information available about the human condition and its relationship with society and this is a particularly fascinating topic to me. But I would like to know what other people see and especially what you think.
So what do you think?
[b] Returning soldier effect[/b]
[quote][b]
The returning soldier effect[/b] is a phenomenon which suggests that more boys are born immediately after wars. This effect is one of the many factors influencing human sex ratio. It was especially noticeable worldwide during and right after both of the World Wars.
The phenomenon was first noticed in 1883 by Carl Düsing of the University of Jena, who suggested that it was a natural regulation of the status quo. Writing in 1899, an Australian physician, Arthur Davenport, used Düsing's findings to hypothesize that the cause was the difference between the comparative ill-health of the returning troops compared to the good health of their partners.
Research published in 1954 by Brian MacMahon and Thomas F. Pugh showed that the sex ratio of white live births in the United States had shown a marked increase in favor of boys between 1945 and 1947, after World War II, with a peak in 1946.
In 2007, Kanazawa Satoshi published a paper theorizing that the effect was due to "the fact that taller soldiers are more likely to survive battle and that taller parents are more likely to have sons". This was based on his research of British Army records from the First World War, which showed that "surviving soldiers were on average more than one inch (3.33 cm) taller than fallen soldiers".[1] Other genetic explanations have been proposed.
Valerie Grant attributed it to changing hormone levels of women during war, as they tended to "adopt more dominant roles".
William H. James writing in 2008 gave an increase in coital rates by returning soldiers as a possible cause. He also noted that a fall in the ratio of male births had been recorded in Iran following the Iran–Iraq War, "explained by psychological stress causing pregnant women disproportionately to abort male fetuses".
The normal ratio is estimated to be some 1.03 to 1.06 males per female, which appears to compensate for the fact that child mortality rate among boys is slightly bigger than among girls, and that adult men are a bit more likely to die from an accident than women.
[/b][/quote]
-Wikipedia
In an increasingly complex and evolving data driven world I find myself further intrigued and interested sometimes concerned and sometimes horrified or simply confused and/or just frustrated by the lack of information available about the human condition and its relationship with society and this is a particularly fascinating topic to me. But I would like to know what other people see and especially what you think.
So what do you think?
46-50, F
